Digital literacy is the knowledge, skills, and behaviors used in a broad range of digital devices such as smartphones, tablets, laptops and desktop PCs, all of which are seen as network rather than computing devices. –Wikipedia
Some
of you might have a problem with the definition of digital literacy above I
have presented above. And I am will to bet that it is because I pulled it from
Wikipedia. I might hear sighs of exacerbation because I am an educated graduate
student who has stooped to using Wikipedia and incorporating it into a formal
class assignment. I know your reasons why you may have a problem with this and
I understand why you discourage or may discourage students from using
Wikipedia. I have used those same exact arguments myself when teaching class.
But I utilized Wikipedia to illustrate a point about digital literacy and how
we sometimes teach it to our students. Yet consider this: have you adequately
explained to your students how Wikipedia operates and how entries are made?
Have you demonstrated that, because it is open to the public, mistakes will
occur, facts may be incorrect, and that concepts may not be well defined or
explained, and that source materials may not be adequately cited. I will take
it one step further: have you ever confessed that you as a teacher may have
used it on occasion? I have. It is great way to get quick information about a
book, a movie, or a scientific idea I may come across in a book or discussion
that I know nothing about and want a quick reference about it so that I
understand it immediately before moving on in my reading or discussion. It is a
tool that has its place, and yet we discourage students from using it in their
academic endeavors rather than explaining its strengths and weaknesses so that
our students can understand when and
not to use it. If we “Google” something to get an answer that may solve a
conversational argument one night at a bar with friends over drinks, how do we
know that the source we tap on our smartphones is in any way better than Wikipedia?
It sounds like we as teachers need a little bit of training in digital literacy
ourselves, and that is okay. In fact, I would encourage seeking such training.
Most of our students are way more equipped than us to handle all things digital
across many platforms. I have seen their strengths in this regard, and I have
also seen their weaknesses.
Our
heads have been in the books with teacher preparation during college to get us
ready for the classroom. Our students have had their heads in digital devices (one
form or another) for most of their lives. Can you see the potential for
conflict in the classroom arena over lessons involving reading and writing with
this last example? How can we synergize both camps on the path of digital
literacy to bring focus and balance?
Let’s not forget that it is not just
digital literacy we are dealing with, but digital
literacies. “From a sociocultural perspective, these different ways of
reading and writing and the ‘enculturations’ that lead to becoming proficient
in them are literacies.” (Lankshear
& Knobel, pp 7). I have never considered before (though it should have been
apparent) that how two people write blogs, emails, make social media postings,
create websites, and so forth can be vastly different. Even the use of language
employed will have many distinct varieties. It is daunting to think about the
complexities when approaching digital literacy and incorporating it
successfully into the classroom. And there are generational differences amongst
teachers that present certain problems.
For a young twenty-something teacher, the
idea of employing digital literacy within the classroom may be easy for that
person since s/he has grown up with digital media. I am forty-seven years old.
I remember when computers were a cute novelty to be used once a year in certain
classes and no more. But I did not get a cellphone until I was forty, because I
did not like the behaviors people exhibited in public and social settings
thanks to using the cellphone and resisted getting it lest I start exhibiting
those same behaviors. I am not fluid in digital media, and when decided to
catch up to the 21st century and buy a SmartTV, it was students I
turned to get their advice about which model to buy (and I wound up buying the
model they had suggested and I am quite happy with it). At least I had the
wisdom to turn to the experts: my freshmen students. I know they are a valuable
resource and that they can teach me things about all things digital. As one
article noted that I took to heart, “One way to capitalize on the synergies
between digital and disciplinary literacies is to reconsider the expert/novice
binary.” (Manderino & Castek, pp. 80) when it comes to the reading apprenticeship
approach. Now, can I teach my students how to use all things digital properly,
employing critical thinking to discern, decode, comprehend, and apply information?
I think I can—at least with some proper training. But what about teachers in
their fifties and sixties who have to ask me how does our new copier work, or
are still using flip-phones and yearn for the “good old days” of using a
mimeograph to make classroom copies? There are resources out there for teachers
to learn about employing digital literacies in the classroom, but I believe
school-led training is required. And what about underfunded schools with
limited technological resources? What about students from families at the
poverty line that may not have internet or a computer at home, but we want to
assign a digital media project? The problems of bringing digital learning to
the classroom have just increased. Not to mention a typical teacher complaint:
“My students have problems putting together a proper sentence together on
paper, but now you want me to also teach them how to use digital literacies as
well?” Challenges abound, and we as teachers sometimes get lost on what to do.
This is a new age of digital learning,
that, like it or not, is here to stay. And we as teachers must adapt to it and
“grab the bull by its horns” and wrestle with it and learn how best to use it
in in education. To paraphrase Lankshear & Knobel (pp 14) we have to: 1)
become more aware of the diversity of digital media that is out there; 2)
approach digital use through the lens of sociocultural understanding and
understand there are multiple digital literacies out there; 3) employ practices
that adopt the best strengths these literacies have to offer within the
classroom (and outside) and to know their weaknesses or misuses as well.
P.S. I apologize if some boxes come up with a question mark in them, or if the text or picture alignment is a little disjointed. This is my first time writing an entry, and I had a hell of a time trying to make my post presentable since I wrote this on a MS Word document first, then when I cut and pasted it to this blog, the "translation" between Word and this blog did not go over very well. Then on top of it, as I was trying to edit and correct everything, the pictures and text began to swim around chaotically and created something of a mess for me to decipher and learn how to correct properly. See? I'm not very digitally-literate in this regard. Another challenge for me! ;)
Hello Christopher,
ReplyDeleteGreat lead with Wikipedia--always a topic in classes but as you said, useful for certain purposes maybe more-so than any other site. It was also interesting how just creating this blog post tied into the actual substance of your post (with the transfer difficulties etc.)
I actually had commented on Tiffini's post a thought I had that you expanded upon for me. I noticed that I grew up with computers. I have had assignments using computers at least since I was 12. In that way, digital literacies are more a first language for me than for you, as you described. But most importantly, it is an ever-popular language amongst the youth who are increasingly fluent in it. And while our own guidance to encourage students to make meaning from digital sources and validate information they find on the internet, we also have much to learn from them.
You mentioned mimeographs as something that the longest-tenured teachers may still be using. I looked up what that was, and while I do not think my schools ever used one, I was reminded of binding machines. Let's see if I can explain what I am remembering. In elementary and middle school, teachers would often present home-made books in class of Xerox'd pages bound together by a thick, black, spiral clasp binding (Example: http://www.nbp.org/nbp/images/business/plastic_binding.jpg). Nowadays, if a teacher wants to share a large amount of text with a class, they have digital technologies to facilitate it. However, I have fond memories at my first elementary school when we would, as a reward for good behavior, get to help the teacher bind those books and collate papers. What this anecdote comes to is that I think there may be a touch of nostalgia for old ways of doing things. And this may in some form provide some friction towards moving into digital technologies. I was reminded of this, again, by your bringing up mimeographs and was wondering your thoughts about this.
Nice post,
Max
Dear Max:
DeleteThere is a nostalgia for the "good old days," but there is also just plain human stubbornness about learning something new as a teacher. As human beings, we tend to be conservative and not want to change our old, practiced habits, which have become engrained into our psyches. Couple this with the idea that we have, as teachers, to learn something new and then incorporate it into teaching when we have so little time to get done the things we are supposed to accomplish throughout the school year, and you see why some teachers resist something like digital literacies. It is easier for some who grew up with such technology and those more difficult for those that did not. I'm stuck somewhere in the middle. And I'm always worried about time given the sheer volume of my teaching responsibilities. And so few schools are willing to offer the training to teachers if they want digital literacies to be incorporated into the curriculum. The school has the responsibility of setting aside time to instruct teachers in the technology and its incorporation and application within the classroom.
Yeah, that makes a lot of sense, Christopher. Schools really do need to accept their end of the responsibility in allotting time for enrichment.
DeleteChristopher,
ReplyDeleteI like what you did making this blog post about Wikipedia. Like most, I was also discouraged from using Wikipedia as a legitimate source. But like you, I also use it whenever I'm not familiar with someone/something/somewhere I don't know about that pops up in conversation. I think it is important that we teach kids, as you said, how to process Wikipedia. A definite strength of Wikipedia is the sources it can lead you to. Although I was discouraged to use it, I was taught to look at the sources at the bottom as potential sources. That being said, it is VERY important that we teach kids what is a legitimate, reliable source. I'm terrified at some of the sources I see people here at UIC use at the college level.
Another point that struck me was your commentary on how teaching technology can have a lot of obstacles. I think this relates to Tiffini's post and how she mentioned that we are at high risk of creating yet another social gap. I think this gap will be so detrimental that it will create a huge economic divide.
Jessica:
DeleteThank you, Jessica! And, yes, we are in danger of not only creating a gap but perpetuating one that already exists. A question I always have to keep in mind is: what if a student does not have a computer at home or internet access? How does the student complete the assignment? My school always makes a policy that a student should have access to the necessary resources, and if not, and alternative assignment must be given. Then how do you give an alternative assignment on digital literacy if the student does not have the resources? And my students are bused, so they can't remain after school to use the technological resources. It is things like this that prevent or hinder me from creating lessons involving technology.
Christopher,
ReplyDeleteI really enjoyed the approach you used in the beginning of the blog. It reminded me of my high school days when the teacher would actually go over what was considered a credible source. In my case, I was well aware that Wikipedia wasn’t the source to use and we were always frowned upon if we even mentioned it. Like you stated, at some point we always end up on Wikipedia to brush on up on some facts or even to look up a concept we really didn’t understand. I do agree that we have to show students when it’s appropriate to use such source. This being said the way you posted the picture of “if it’s on the internet then it must be true”, we are in the century were we look up everything on the internet so I do think it becomes a crucial component to have students understand the difference of the sources involved.
When you mentioned the mimeograph, I actually did a quick search on the internet to inform myself of what it was. I never heard of such object, so again the first thought I had was “I better google this” and after realizing what it was I understood what you had meant about “yearn for the good old days”. The internet is a great tool that can be used in the classroom, we just have to teach students when to use such technologies.
Alejandra:
DeleteI'm glad you were able to learn what a mimeograph was, because when I started teaching, it was still being used by many people! When it was finally retired, a psychology teacher took it and put it into his classroom so he could use it! He was a great instructor, but a technological dinosaur. A good example of how people still cling to the old and familiar because that is what they are used to and do not wish to change their set ways.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteGreat post Christopher,
ReplyDeleteWhen I was in elementary school no one really told me what Wikipedia was all about. I was a very prolific user of the website, and often caught myself using it as a source for many projects. I think the first time I was ever made aware that Wikipedia was not a legitimate source was when I was in eighth grade. Obviously I now know better than to use the website as a source for school work, however, I believe its a valuable source to have at ones disposal.
Like yourself, I use Wikipedia for some quick information on a subject that I might not be familiar with. Sometimes the pages have some cited sources that I would have never found on my own. It can be a very powerful tool if used correctly. I think that we should not discourage students from making themselves familiar with a website like Wikipedia. We are living in a world where students can now look up answers for whatever question they have almost instantly. I think we should be teaching students what a reliable source looks like, instead of teaching them to dismiss certain sources. We can for example, bring to the students attention how a website ends. For the most part something that ends in .gov or .edu is good to go and more than likely a reliable source.
Jaasiel:
ReplyDeleteThank you! But I think it takes more than just to help discriminate on the surface level (but it is a start, especially for our younger students). What's important is to get them to evaluate the information critically for comprehension and application (such as information that can be used in a report or project). Getting them to easily distinguish good sources from poor or unreliable ones is salient, but then getting them to comprehend it then apply it is the next tricky part. Too often, I ind students do not take the time to be selective and evaluate their potential sources, preferring, instead, to save time and go with the first thing they see because they want to get the project completed and get a grade (and not necessarily a good grade, just a passing grade). You can spend class time doing this, but it takes a great deal of time that cuts into the time of other lessons. And we only have so much time in a school year.