Sunday, October 30, 2016

Complex Texts and How to Navigate Them
Chapter 6 of Buehl begins by discussing a myriad of complex subjects: Renaissance music, neuroscience and a challenging read from Dostoyevsky. All of this revolves around the essential question posed at the beginning of the chapter: How can instruction scaffold the reading of complex disclipinary texts? Areas such as science and math are not quite my forte but I have applied these skills to literature and history countless times throughout my education and as a teacher in some small ways.

When we examine historical texts, many students are discouraged by the sheer volume of necessary prior knowledge in some cases. To understand a new concept or figure, we must trace back the thought/figure through a variety of different sources. For example, if I were to lecture and say "The success of oil baron John D. Rockefeller during the Gilded Age was in spite of, or perhaps because of, his rivalry with the steel king Andrew Carnegie", there is much to be teased out and explained to a student with no prior knowledge. Such as "What is an oil baron? When was the Gilded Age? If Rockefeller was in the oil business and Carnegie was in steel, why were they rivals?". It is a disservice to students to teach without leaving the floor wide open for questions and inquiry to build their knowledge so that sentences such as the one above fly straight as an arrow and not sail over the head.

One particular example of this that stuck out in my mind was when I was a counselor for a middle schooler's summer camp a few months back and I had this kid named Amar'e. Amar'e loved music, he used to dance and rap all the time. I would give him shit for playing Chief Keef and Drake, and he would throw it back at me for saying everything I listened to was weird and no one liked it. So, one day he was listening to Drake and he said "Man, I don't know why people think Kendrick Lamar is better than Drake, that's bullshit." And I asked "Why do you think that?" and he said "Kendrick is always talking about things I don't know, he doesn't make sense most of the time."

Understanding that he was a 14 year old boy, I said "Ok, play me a song by Drake and tell me what you like about it as the song plays. The lyrics, the beat, whatever". He played me his current favorite, "Too Good" and told me about his girlfriend that he really cared about, and how they have problems and he has anger issues. The song is, in my opinion, a bit simple but that's the beauty of music, a song that doesn't mean much to me means the world to Amar'e.

So then, I reintroduced Amar'e to "Wesley's Theory", and taught him ideas such as that the titular Wesley is a reference to Wesley Snipes, who was jailed for tax evasion, and how the song was about a character who sold out for money because Uncle Sam made him do that, the insanity of America made him do that. Amar'e listened intently, and he was a little overwhelmed but he seemed determined to understand. When we take dense, complex works and give students the spaces and tools to learn and to understand, their creativity blossoms. 

5 comments:

  1. Joe,

    I really admire the tactfulness you demonstrated in this situation with your student. I also think that this real life instance, that is non-academic in nature, could be the key to helping students develop a metacognitive mindset to any kind of texts that they are confronted with. In the scenario you introduced to us, where Amar'e is obviously very passionate about his music, you capitalized on Amar'e's emotion by making him focus on and argue the specific reasons for which he believes his favorite artists are better than others. Amar'e displays what Beuhl calls the "means to developing skill" (220) amongst which are dedication, determination, perseverance and frustration management. This shows that Amar'e is already armed with some of the discipline and habits that a reader needs for tackling complex texts.
    I imagine that this was also a unique moment for Amar'e where he was forced to make a compelling and thoughtful case in favor of an argument he believes in that actually holds a great deal of personal value. When we take interest in the lives of our students, we can find ways to relate what we are teaching in a way that is more readily accessible.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Joe,
    I read your post and could not help but view your conversation with Amar'e from both the teacher's and the student's perspective. As I connect my thoughts to the text this week, I immediately go to the section of Developing Reader Moves. (Buehl, Ch. 6) Even though Wilhelm (2001) related proficient readers to highly skilled athletes, I thought that this process would have been beneficial for Amar'e as well. While I am not minimizing your ability to engagement and connect with your students, I thought that having Amar'e dig a little deeper and go a little further in his comparison to the two artist would benefit him even more. Because he already seems to have an interest in music and this comparison is already a part of his world, challenging him to try to listen to and try to explain the things that Kendrick Lamar are saying that he doesn't understand can be beneficial. Of course not without giving him a few comprehensive moves to approach this like:
    - trying to think about things you already know that are connected to what you are reading.
    - trying to picture in your head what the author is saying.
    - Raise questions while you're reading.
    - try to decide what a person should know about what the author tells me.
    - look for implication of things that are not directly stated.
    - Try to sum up what an author is saying your own words.

    I believe in doing this he would be able to engage in methods that you would want him to apply in future lessons and also give a more sound argument of his reason for liking Drake more to you and his peers. This will help him understand that what he learn in school is not just for school; but for life. Who knows. It he may even start to like Kendrick Lamar. (or some other thing/subject that he doesn't understand by applying this method) What do you think?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Joe - thanks for posting. Your experience with your student illuminates one of the most important strategies for engaging in complex texts: collaboration and socializing. Buehl explores this concept on p 259-260. Though all the other independent strategies in Chapter 6 are no doubt useful, I think the notion of SHARING knowledge and allowing that exchange to dictate the construction of meaning for BOTH parties is particularly powrful. Shared experiences dictate a lot of what any social system values, so when two people come together to share what they know and discover what they don't, both leave enriched and feeling slightly less mystified by the feeling of "ignorance;" they are able to conceptualize a solution to not knowing, simply by conversing with other. In an indirect way, this also promotes the use of cognitive and metacognitive strategies for engaging with tough texts, albeit in a collaborative mode.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Joe,

    Your encounter with your students exemplifies a very important article of teaching. Not only did you scaffold a complex idea and topic. but you also did so using a method that the students understands and enjoys. I think this is crucial when scaffolding in new ideas for students. It is much easier for students to grasp a new concept when it is being instructed through a means that they can understand and enjoy.
    This is definitely one of the areas, as a future educator, that I am nervous for. As an educator you want to present challenging information to your students, but not so challenging that they give up or get overwhelmed. That is why the execution of scaffolding methods are so imperative and why they must be efficient.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Joe,
    I love your story of understanding a students taste in music and giving him the tools to understand a text that was foreign to him. Everyone understands words differently, and sometimes it takes listening to another person's interpretation to see what makes a text special or meaningful. We can use this technique to make complex texts more relatable to our students and easier to digest. Scafolding can be challenging but it can also be personal for both sides.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.